man, 09.05.2005 kl. 16.14 skrev Gerry Tool: > Stuart Jansen wrote: > > >On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 13:28 +0200, nodata wrote: > > > > > >>On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 12:42 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Once I got use to spatial nautilus, it's actually what I prefer. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>I tried to get used to it, but found the way it opened new windows on > >>top of the old ones really annoying. > >> > >> > > > >Yes, that can be annoying. Thankfully, because Nautilus remembers the > >position and size of a window when it was last opened, it gets better > >with time. I have a folder filled with many PDFs. Previously, to open a > >specific PDF I'd have to scan the list until I found the one I wanted. > >Now thanks to spatial Nautilus, I can quickly find the one's I use most > >frequently by automatically homing in on their location on the screen. > >Because so many have similar names, this is faster than even tab > >completion. (And now that I have evince showing thumbnails in Nautilus, > >it's pretty easy to find less frequently used PDfs also.) > > > >A giant thank you to the developers of nautilus and evince! > > > > > > > I don't know if it has been mentioned before in this thread, but if you > want the next spatial view to open in the same window that you are > clicking in, just "middle click" the entry and it will use the same > window. I find this feature along with the spatial paradigm to be the > best file navigation facility around. It took some time to get used to, > but I almost never open a Browse Window anymore. > > Gerry But there is something *really* lacking from spatial - the adressbar etc. - its so usefull to be able to use SSH etc. without having to know to hit "control+L"...