On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:08 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> hi axel!
>
> heres the bug... happens with a thinkpad r51 centrino with ipw2200 ;))
> i think thats fixed for the latest prepatch
Is there really a patch for the driver or is it a firmware patch?
Also, where might I find this fix?
I am seeing the same bug on the Dell Precision M70 laptop which also
uses the ipw2200:
=====================================================================
[root@jaguar WPA-source]# wpa_supplicant -i eth1 \
-c wpa_supplicant.conf -D ipw -w -dd
Initializing interface 'eth1' conf 'wpa_supplicant.conf' driver 'ipw'
Configuration file 'wpa_supplicant.conf' -> 'wpa_supplicant.conf'
Reading configuration file 'wpa_supplicant.conf'
ctrl_interface='/var/run/wpa_supplicant'
ctrl_interface_group=0
eapol_version=1
ap_scan=1
fast_reauth=1
Line: 311 - start of a new network block
ssid - hexdump_ascii(len=7):
6f 72 6e 6c 77 70 61 ornlwpa
scan_ssid=1 (0x1)
proto: 0x1
key_mgmt: 0x1
eap methods - hexdump(len=2): 19 00
pairwise: 0x8
group: 0x8
--- snip ---
--- snip ---
Initializing interface (2) 'eth1'
EAPOL: SUPP_PAE entering state DISCONNECTED
EAPOL: KEY_RX entering state NO_KEY_RECEIVE
EAPOL: SUPP_BE entering state INITIALIZE
EAP: EAP entering state DISABLED
EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0
EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0
wpa_driver_ipw_init is called
ioctl[SIOCSIWPMKSA]: Operation not supported
Own MAC address: 00:12:f0:04:8c:e4
wpa_driver_ipw_set_wpa: enabled=1
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=0 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
Failed to set encryption.
wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=1 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
Failed to set encryption.
wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=2 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
Failed to set encryption.
wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=3 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
Failed to set encryption.
wpa_driver_ipw_set_countermeasures: enabled=0
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
wpa_driver_ipw_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1
ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
Setting scan request: 0 sec 100000 usec
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b06 len=8
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'eth1' added
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'eth1' added
State: DISCONNECTED -> SCANNING
Starting AP scan (specific SSID)
Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=7):
6f 72 6e 6c 77 70 61 ornlwpa
Scan timeout - try to get results
Received 2070 bytes of scan results (10 BSSes)
Scan results: 10
Selecting BSS from priority group 0
--- snip --
--- snip ----
No suitable AP found.
Thanks,
Ernest
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160648
>
> 2005/6/21, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:48:36PM -0400, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Here it is: Remember the google!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://atrpms.net/dist/fc4/
> > > > No.
> > > > That only fives a SPEC file. Where are the RPMS?
> >
> > All rpms were removed and scheduled for a rebuild on FC4 proper.
> >
> > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=545
> >
> > > Okay, some more googling reveals:
> > > http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant
> > >
> > > I would like to get some source RPMS for FC4 but for now I will use the
> > > pure source distro.
> >
> > Use the src.rpms for FC3, or wait for ATrpms to launch official FC4
> > support. :)
> >
> > > Has anyone else tried the ipw2200+wpa combo with FC4?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ernest
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Ernest
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> >
> >
> >
>