On 6/20/05, Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've answered this question already in verbosity. Just don't ignore the > arguments presented. Pardon me, from now on I'll make sure to to check for new thread posts in my inbox before I hit the send button. That's what I get for actually taking the time to spell check a post for once. Here's what I'll do.. from now on 'll travel 10 minutes into the future, long enough to account for any lag in mail delivery of your post to make sure there is no chance that I'll be sending a response that covers information you yourself are responding to at the same time I'm responding. Man think about how many software race conditions could be solved with that 10-minute into the future technology. I think I smell a patent. > > Its more likely you misunderstand what is going on.. and are assuming > > that people are trying to replace bugzilla as a tracking tool with the > > wiki... which is not the case. > > Then don't promote it as such like Rahul did. I'm promoting it? I don't think I've promoted anything. I think Rahul can vouch for the fact that I've voiced my own pointed concerns about duplication of information. I'm personally, not overly concerned with information in the wiki going unnoticed or not finding its way into bugzilla as an rfe. I'm much more concerned about information and ideas being lost in the morass of the mailinglists. You are free to disagree with what some people are trying to do with the wiki, at least until someone decides that the wiki is the one true way to communicate and shuts down other forms of communication and uses neural implant technology to govern whatever thoughts you might have that contradict the official order. -jef"okay well I promote KK doughnuts and tequila a lot... but not in this thread. I swear.. I will not promote KK doughnuts and tequila in this thread. Now I need to go eat a KK doughnut and drink a shot of tequila."spaleta