On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 17:15 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 18:50 -0500, Kyle Pointer wrote: > > > > extras is a path to core. > > > No. Extras is the path to the dark side. > > Why is that? or are you just being flippant? > > Historically speaking, extras seem to be where packages go to die. Isn't this the first release where packages have been moved to extras? I think it is better for a package personally - some packages weren't getting the attention they should of in core - but in extras, they are maintained by people who actually WANT them. > > Or like a roach motel - "they check in but they don't check out". Must have your cvs misconfigured or something ;)