On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 17:15 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 18:50 -0500, Kyle Pointer wrote: > > > > extras is a path to core. > > > No. Extras is the path to the dark side. > > Why is that? or are you just being flippant? > > Historically speaking, extras seem to be where packages go to die. > > Or like a roach motel - "they check in but they don't check out". > Historically speaking? Are any of the packages in Fedora Extras 4 poorly maintained? Are any of them languishing, unloved? Are packages not being updated and new packages not being uploaded? I don't think you can answer yes to any of those questions. So before you talk about how extras is not doing well, show me some evidence of that. -sv