On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 16:02 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:59 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:58 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > why not package it for extras for FC4? > > > > Indeed, I could do such a thing. However, is printing something we want > > to send off to "extras" ? > > extras is a path to core. > > Get it packaged for extras and it has an easier trip to get to core. > > And if FC4's release has shown us anything it has shown us that "sending > off to extras" doesn't mean a whole lot. Extras is immediately > accessible via yum and from what I've heard from various folks being > fairly well received. > > So yah - off in extras - but still extremely accessible. :) > -sv > > Excellent idea, I will get started on this tonight... Thanks for the input. Sean