> > [1] Supported is something of a misnomer here given Fedora by its nature > > is unsupported, but for sake of argument think "We'll investigate this > > bug if it gets filed in bugzilla.redhat.com" > > Actually the problem here is that these bugs appear to be regressions in > the fedora _installer_ (which is why they were filed against anaconda). > That is, they are not related to kernel bugs (you cannot even install > reiserfs with selinux *disabled*). But they are summarily closed WONTFIX > which I find troubling. the same is true for reiser/xfs/etc bugs in the installer. Unless they come with a patch, they're not getting attention by RH folks. Does that make them second class citizens? Only partially. If nobody else cares about them enough to make a patch either, then yes they end up being second class citizens. Otoh if someone else stands up and starts caring, they aren't.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part