Marius Andreiana wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 17:57 -0400, Gene C. wrote:
I don't know about others but when I see a report with "devel" specified as
the version, I have no idea just what version is really havin the problem.
development (ex-rawhide) at the date of the report.
I would like to see test1, test2, test3 go away ... at least as an option for
reporting a bug.
same here. Perhaps they can be renamed fc1test1,fc1test2 ? (even if they
have both fc1 and fc2)
i do not know if "FCnTESTn" was in bugzilla before but it is
--------
product:
fedora core
version:
devel
fc1
fc2
fc3
fc3test1
fc3test2
fc3test3
fc4test1
fc4test2
test1
test2
test3
----/----
i have no glue about databases and normalization
but for me it sounds bad to fill the "version" with eg. "fc4711test0815".
if it is really necessary it would make more sense to have
version: fcn
newfield: testn
imho "fcn"
"devel" = rawhide between fc4test3 <-> fc5test1
and "testing" = rawhide while testing fc4test1 <-> fc4test3
should be enough.
eg.
--------
<bug_id> opened by <reporter> on <date_time>
product:
fedora core
version:
testing
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
<rpm-q package>
----/----
--
shrek-m