Re: laptops and cron maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:10:21PM +0200, Miloslav Trmac wrote:

AFAIK it was turned off because "desktop users" don't use locate,

Re. to mitr:
That isn't why it was turned off at all, from my recollection.

The updatedb cron job grinds any modern machine to a screeching
halt when it kicks in.  This makes my machine totally useless for
anywhere from 3-10 minutes, at which point prelink then seems to
occasionally kick in and makes it useless for many more minutes.

This problem affects many users.  I'm not sure what the best solution
to the problem is, but having this happen on a laptop must be
horrible.  ( I don't have a laptop so am going by opinions of
others who do.)

My understanding is that it was disabled due to desktop
interactivity problems such as those myself and many others
experience when updatedb kicks in.  Saying "desktop users do
not use locate" is absurd for several reasons:

1) It's simply not true
2) Our OS is used by hobbiests, enthusiasts, server admins,
   and a variety of other usage cases which include "desktop"
   users ranging from "engineering desktop/workstation" to
   "corporate desktop" to "home desktop (to a lesser extent)".


Eh?  How this gem of information was derived?  This definitely
does not mesh up with what I am seeing and I am not talking about
myself.  Sure, this is anecdotal and not statistical.

Agreed.

This will likely become a self-fulfilling prophecy as with locate
turned by default effectively off a percentage of using it will
surely go down.

I think we can derive some useful facts about locate:

1) It's widely used by our userbase
2) When updatedb kicks in, it causes interactivity problems, which
   affect people using a GUI desktop (regardless of the class of
   user using the desktop, be they technical or be they Grandma)

The problem to solve, is basically:

- What different approaches might there be to solving this problem
  and both keeping "locate" available by default, and also reducing
  or eliminating the horrible interactivity problem that occurs when
  updatedb runs?

There are many possible solutions in theory.

- Disable updatedb from running by default.  This isn't a solution,
  it is simply avoiding the problem from happening by default by
  making locate unuseable by default.  It just inconveniences users
  who do still want locate to work, who now have to re-enable it
  and then still end up with the interactivity problem.  Bad
  resolution.

- Perhaps alter updatedb's script to use iorenice to lower it's
  I/O priority and improve interactivity?  Not sure if this would
  actually result in the desired behaviour or not, but I'm sure
  one of our kernel guys can advise wether this would truly help
  or not.

- Enhance updatedb so that it only kicks in if the machine has
  been idle for so long (keyboard/mouse) kindof like a screensaver.
  If someone presses a key or moves the mouse, it's sent a signal
  to stop or something.  This suggestion is unrefined but can be
  potentially a basis for further ideas/discussion.

- Turn updatedb into a daemon which updates the database by using
  fam/gamin to get directory notification events.  Not sure how
  feasible or crackrock this might be, but it popped into my mind,
  and if it is feasible, and any problems it might have could be
  worked out, might make locate even more useful.

- Explore possible alternatives to updatedb which are friendlier
  to the system (if there are any).

I'm sure others might have additional suggestions.  Feel free
to comment on mine.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]