On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 23:02 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > s�7.04.2005 kl. 22.45 skrev nodata: > > On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 16:43 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > Two questions: > > > > > > > > Was slocate *really* disabled just because of laptop users? > > > > > > > > Please can we have "if it's installed, it's enabled" behaviour? > > > > > > 'if it is installed, it is enabled' is INCREDIBLY dangerous. > > > > > > > > > in general all services should be disabled by default. > > > > > > -sv > > > > True for networked services, why for this? > > It can definatly be annoying for stationary systems as well, especially > those who isn't booted to often. Every time you try to use it, it gets > �ow... > Perhaps, but the justification for disabling it seems to be: 1. Laptops 2. Err.. that's it. and disabling such a common useful tool with next to no justification seems, well, bizarre.