On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:54 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:39 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > theoretically, should this work? > > > > Short answer: > > > Maybe. > > > > Long answer: > > > Test releases update against Rawhide, and Rawhide isn't always in a > > consistent state. Updates against it have been known to fail from > > time to time. Just report the problems in the mailing list and > > someone will get around to fixing it. > > ok, that's fair. but, just to be clear, in a perfect world, "yum > update" is all i should have to do if all the repos are consistent for > a new install? (once i turn off gpgcheck) Assuming you don't have problems induced by packages that were removed, yes. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part