On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 4/13/05, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > a previous yum update failed, so i restarted it, and got a slew of > > packages now claiming they need "libpq.so.3". thoughts? > > not much to think about.. if i dont know which packages are > invovled. I have a box that is fully updated with rawhide at the > moment.. via yum. So you obviously have different packages installed > than i do. Yum's error message are usually enough to point me in the > right direction to figure out the specific problem.. and how to > reproduce it... but I can't do that from the qualitative summary you > posted. ok, in order to minimize the chance of making a mess of an update, what's the minimum set of repo files i need to enable if i want to do nothing more than update existing packages? of the five that came with fc4t2, i'm guessing i need only fedora-devel.repo, is that a reasonable guess? rday