Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
From: "shrek-m@xxxxxx" <shrek-m@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:47:28 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504130752010.10029@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1113291855.14576.41.camel@mgb.bullion.ims> <1113294617.10362.12.camel@fc4t2.mpeters.local> <1113326513.14576.124.camel@mgb.bullion.ims> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504130752010.10029@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050323 Fedora/1.7.6-1.3.2

Res wrote:

ever wonder why most other popular distros have stuck to lilo  :)



suse ?
debian ?
mandrake ?
ubuntu ?
...


--
shrek-m

References:
- FC4t2 no good without LILO
  - From: Mike Bird
- Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
  - From: Michael A. Peters
- Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
  - From: Mike Bird
- Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
  - From: Res

Prev by Date: Re: some music would be great
Next by Date: Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
Previous by thread: Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
Next by thread: Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]