On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 23:32 -0400, Chuck R. Anderson wrote: > > That doesn't test the installer case very well. Most people do not > > do anaconda installs of random rawhide builds. > > Why not? I do anaconda installs of random rawhide builds all the time > by booting the files in isolinux/ using grub. The only bit that > doesn't get tested is the actual ISO generation. If most people don't > know this can be done, perhaps it should be publicized more. I do it via nfs; I sync almost daily, and kick off random x86/ppc installs But ISO generation bits even releng ;-) > > I think Robert's suggestion is completely rational. > > I don't see the need for a full iso set to be generated that often. > Test releases are just "stable" points in the rawhide tree that happen > about once a month. I think this is often enough for full iso sets. Of course, we could then start posting xdelta's of the ISOs if we want to generate daily. It'll work for most days unless there's a mass rebuild -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi