Re: Gimp-print vs gutenprint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:39 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Indeed it is not "released," but neither is OO.org2...  But no worries,
> there's always FC5...  :)
> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:34 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:37:35AM -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > 
> > > Was wondering if it is too late in the test cycle to suggest that
> > > gimp-print(v4.7) be replaced with gutenprint(v5.0 beta 3)?
> > > 
> > > http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
> > 
> > Gutenprint isn't even released yet!
> > 
> > Tim.
> > */
> > -- 
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: 
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> 
On a side note to this thread, I installed gutenprint on my FC4T1 box
and I experienced some strange cups behaviour.  The Web Admin interface
allowed me to change the driver on my printer to the Gutenprint "driver"
but the printer-config util doesn't notice that I have installed these
"drivers"

Is this expected behavior, or is there something amiss here?

Sean


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]