Re: Missing library into package <xorg-x11-libs>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:39:52PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Axel - 
> 
> If you are doing ppc packages for FC4 and want to me to test them let me
> know where to get them.

I have no ppc hardware, but some folks at atrpms-devel (Jarod?) have,
so you can join and rebuild the packages. But note that there have
been some efforts by Jarod to build on FC4's gcc 4 and he reported
lots of packages not building :/

> I may have a mini-itx /unichrome box I can setup with FC4 as well if
> that would help.

That would certainly help, too. Unichrome support at ATrpms is
maturing. :)

Thanks!

> Bret
> 
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:26, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 02:03:44PM -0500, Stephane Gaucher wrote:
> > > > > no libviaXvMC.so.1 into the /usr/X11R6/lib folder
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can you help me !?!
> > > > 
> > > > You fetched an xorg-x11-libs package from the ATrpms repository which
> > > > has an older version and release than the one that is installed already.
> > > > Hence your installation attempt failed, because the installed xorg-x11
> > > > packages require the newer xorg-x11-libs (which is installed already).
> > > > That's what the error message says.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So you sugest me to fore an installation of the new (good version) of
> > > this rpm !?!
> > > 
> > > rpm -Ui --force xorg-x11-libs-6.8.1-12.FC3.21_1.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm
> > 
> > No, you should wait until ATrpms has a chance to catch up with the
> > latest errata. The packages are already built, but recreating all
> > metadata and uploading them introduces some non-insignificant
> > lead-time.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgphQ4bg5ZJVu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]