On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:47:42 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > Most of the packages in Fedora Extras Development are just copies of their > > FC3 counterparts. This is how the tree was filled with packages, creating > > such pitfalls as the broken python dependencies you've noticed. It's a > > pitty the tree was not filled with a mass-rebuild. > > > > Okay michael, i'm sorry you feel "it's a pity". I asked on maintainers > as to which path to take, I received a number of answers via irc and > other locations and the general answer was "merge fc3's extras in, fix > the ones that break". > > I'll rebuild anything that comes up and I'm working all the time on the > build system, what else can I do to keep you from lamenting extras in > the way you do? You can't do anything else, because I disagree with the current procedure, and that's it.