On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:09 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:06:15PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > Historically packages in extras have not been as well maintained... > > > > I'd love to see some proof of that. ANY proof of that, please. > > Not to mention that Extras hasn't existed long enough for there to > really be a history... If you look at the maintenance of packages in Fedora Extras 3 you should see a good history there. Not only of active packagers but also of recent builds of things. so if you go only by the available history, I think things look pretty damned good. -sv