Re: libssl, libcrypt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Watkins wrote:
I'm still having problems with the Rawhide updates for programs depending on the libssl and libcrypto libs for Fedora 3 development.

Does anyone have a solution on how to resolve these dependancies?

Thanks,

Paul



When I upgraded my system through ftp in development, the two packages mentioned were upgraded to the newer versions. Mutt and at least up2date were broken from the library change.

To limp by until mutt (now fixed) and up2date (still broken), I let the newer packages install, then create a symlink from the pasted entries pointing to the newer *.so.5 versions.

Thi got mutt to work until it was fixed very shortly and allows up2date to get so far in the gui and still work from the commandline.

A hack! You should not need to do this after bugs are addressed. A report was filed against up2date for not working with this scheme.

Jim

 ls -la *.so.{4,5}
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 10 17:33 libcrypto.so.4 -> /lib/libcrypto.so.5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 4 12:29 libcrypto.so.5 -> libcrypto.so.0.9.7e
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 16 Mar 10 17:32 libssl.so.4 -> /lib/libssl.so.5
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 16 Mar  4 12:29 libssl.so.5 -> libssl.so.0.9.7e


--
A day for firm decisions!!!!!  Or is it?


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]