> Adding a barebones install option isn't worth it? > > Part of it is increasing the flexibility of fedora by allowing it to be > installed on a wider array of embedded platforms. The other part is just > install efficiency, not having to waste time removing hundreds of rpms > which are useless for headless ISP servers. I think that's part of it, too - fedora's not really targeting the server infrastructure, is it :) > In the end it comes down to fedora being flexible and easily > deployable across a wider array of constrained hardware. > > I don't see why fedora should aim for regression vs. RH9 in this respect. Since you can do the install classes now I don't really see it as a regression but <shrug> spin it however you'd like. -sv