tir, 01.02.2005 kl. 17.52 skrev Rodolfo J. Paiz: > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:52 -0500, Paul Iadonisi wrote: > > Better to pick one of 1) ship an almost-final beta and issue an update > > to 2.0 when it's released, 2) ship 1.1.x and resign ourselves to that > > being the version eternally paired with FC4, 3) delay the release of FC4 > > in the hopes that OOo 2.0 will be shipped so as to not cause a > > significant delay. > > Personally, I'm somewhat partial to delay FC4, but only if the delay > > is, as some one else has suggested, less than 30 days. > > I know I've already said this (in fact, I was the one who suggested <30 > days as a good decision point for delaying FC4), but: > > 1. If <30 days, delay FC4. > 2. If not, then ship the almost-final beta with FC4 and update to > final when it's ready. > > Please... Or provide "openoffice2.org-2.0.i386.rpm" that conflicts openoffice.org in extras?