The e2fsprogs src.rpm includes a version of ext2resize for the ext2online tool, but the spec goes with resize2fs instead of ext2resize. Why? Is resize2fs better tested/maintained than ext2resize? I'm asking out of curiosity and because I get the following with e2fsck after using resize2fs (for shrinking), and I wonder about the integrity of my data: Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(54693--55331) Fix<y>? yes Free blocks count wrong for group #1 (0, conted=639). Fix<y>? yes Free blocks count wrong (645166, conted=645805). Fix<y>? yes Regardless, should I file a bug on resize2fs for the above? Regards, Luciano Rocha -- 3/13