On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 21:18 -0800, Don Russell wrote: > Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > Significant testing means putting OOo-2.x into rawhide so people can > > (and will) bang on it with whatever they use to bang things. ;-] > > Without it's inclusion it rawhide it's going to be really hard to know > > whether it's up to snuff, but given that it's due for final release > > around the same time as FC4 it should be pretty good. > > OK... I have no objection to putting it into rawhide... On the OpenOffice.org2 topic - I'd like 2.0 for FC4 - A little status update, Java became a build-time requirement to create the help-documentation for 2.0, and lots of extra components are in java, so rather than continue to find workarounds by disabling java bits, I expended my time building it with gcj, which is now possible and upstreamed for essential bits. Similiarly hauling around a seperate copy of mozilla, python et al within OOo didn't seem too appealing, http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/progress/progress.png - I'll make some basic x86 rawhide rpms available from http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/openoffice.org2 tomorrow, and sometime during the week ppc arch and the seperate language packs, if its not totally cocked up then perhaps we can think about rawhide :-) C.
