On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:11 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:32:25 -0800 (PST), Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why not make both available? After all, fedora includes both gcc3.x and > > > gcc4, although gcc4 definitely has issues. > > how big are the gcc3.x and gcc4.x package sets? > > how big are the openoffice.org packages? > > Considering the size of openoffice I think it would be irresponsible > > to choose to ship multiple versions of it in Core considering the need > > to be respectful of overall bloat. > > any reason it can't be made available on extras? > > if not, then the question would be -- does it get released later as a yum > update to completely replace openoffice1, or does it wait till FC5? > b/c it is not an extra. it would be an alternative. -sv