On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 10:44 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:42:05AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > There isn't really anything that works for 99% of what we need now > > _except_ bind+caching-nameserver, and since people have a crusade > > against that, we have to fix up lwresd instead. > > Thank you. It's not an irrational crusade, and I appreciate the extra work > you're doing to do this right. > Amen to both points. I was about to post something longer and on the same lines, but Matthew put it more succintly and very well. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>