On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 16:45 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 10:45 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 09:31 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > > NetworkManager's RPM says "It is intended only for the desktop use-case, > > > and is not intended for usage on servers.", yet it is installed by > > > default in the "Base" group (which means going forward bind and > > > caching-nameserver will also be installed by default). I don't need > > > this if I'm building a firewall or server (it actually gets in the way > > > of configuring bind). > > > > I believe I was in error adding the caching-nameserver dep, I'll remove > > that and push another update. > > I actually appear to be wrong on this one, we _do_ need caching- > nameserver from what Colin Walters says, since some of the configuration > for named is stored in the config files /other/ than the main one (ie > reverse DNS info he said?). It seems to be a packaging issue for > caching-nameserver more or less. > > Dan > Will NetworkManager not be in the base install for anaconda "server" installation?