On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:07:50PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:59:46 +0000, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha > > The feature is nice, and I have no problem with it if a visible option > > to turn it off is visible during installation, mentioning it's > > unsuitable for server operation. > > 'unsuitable' i think is a matter of opinion. Of course. > How about we just > explain what that set of rules does in a couple of sentences and let > the server admin determine if its unsuitable or not. > Some server admins would probably find it perfectly fine if the > default timescales invovled in the temporary lock out were suitable. Some server admins don't know how some protocols and application work. And I wouldn't want to see FC4 being rated as slow or disfuncional for network services by less knowledgeable admins, Regards, Luciano Rocha -- Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.