Re: Any danger from these ports?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:58:47AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 15:49 +0000, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > > Is the use of ipt_recent in a similar way something worth considering
> > > as an inclusion to fedora default firewall rules?
> > 
> > Not a default for servers, surely? 
> > 
> 
> Why not? I'd be more than happy if *all* my servers had this feature.
> Allowing no more than 2 login attempts via SSH from each IP address in a
> 60-second period is not something that would affect or inconvenience
> any of my users, but it *is* something that would slow down, annoy, and
> otherwise impair the jackasses who keep trying dictionary and scripted
> attacks against my servers.
> 
> What do you see as the downside to such a feature? Of course one could
> adjust the specific settings (say, no more than 5 attempts in a 60-
> second interval if you want to be liberal), but I see no harm...

For ssh? No downside. For ftp/http/dns/etc, major slowdown and service
breakdown.

Regards,
Luciano Rocha

-- 
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]