On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:47 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > FEDORA-2005-579
>
> Should that be FEDORA-2004-579?
Ahh how the lack of infrastructure bites us again ;-). Apparently the
template script was already updated while I wasn't aware that I should
restart numbering in the list in the new year. I've reserved
FEDORA-2005-004 for the final update (I don't think I really want to use
FEDORA-2005-579 yet ;-).
So for the record: This should really have been 2005-004 or at least
2004-579. Don't confuse this one with the FEDORA-2005-579 update that
might come in the future ;-).
BTW, IMO you shouldn't need to rebuild gimp-print because gimp-2.2 is
(at least claims to be) binary compatible. Let me know if there are
build problems against it though.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011