On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:15:25 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:57:23 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:58:45 +0100, nodata <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > An rpm tool doesn't care about the filename, so why remove it? > > > > > > > > You have missed the point entirely. The filaname for an rpm is > > > > typically constructed from a number of header tags as part of the > > > > build process. The distrotags that are being used arent just in the > > > > filename they are in the RELEASE tag. > > > > > > Which is part of the problem. > > > > Please indicate where the problem is. > > Done that before in this thread. I have not seen any relevant examples to date. Please give it again and tell me why the release tag would become relevant without the repotag. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]