good to know but real soon now 2 and 1/2 weeks ago doesn't seem like real soon now On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:51:49 +0100, Féliciano Matias <feliciano.matias@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Le vendredi 10 décembre 2004 à 21:08 +0930, Mark Bradbury a écrit : > > Hi All > > > > I see threads on this mailing about what games should be included in > > FC4 and responses that say they are included all ready in extras. I > > was just wondering where is this FC3 extras? I have looked at > > fedora.us but the last entry on the web page seems to be Sept. 19. I > > had a look in the > > main repository for FC3 extras and its empty. > > From rom my archive : > > De: Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxx> > Répondre à: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > À: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Objet: fedora.us and Extras FC3 Status > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:25:04 -1000 (mer, 04:25 CET) > > Enough people were confused about the situation, so I am making this > interim anouncement. > > download.fedora.us for FC3 will only replicate from > download.fedora.redhat.com for convenience of apt users. yum users > should use official download.fedora.redhat.com mirrors which are twice > as plentiful. > > Currently the RPMS.extras directory is empty, because redhat's > infrastructure for the Extras relaunch is not done yet. We're *really* > close now with build servers in the rack and CVS in configuration and > heavy testing. Lots of tweaking and labor still pending. Don't ask > for ETA. If we have to answer questions, it will slow us down further. > > Extras when built will be simultaneously available for i386 and x86_64 > (both supported FC3 archs) and distributed in > download.fedora.redhat.com. fedora.us will automatically replicate from > those directories for apt users. > > Details about CVS, contribution legal forms, governance, and development > process & policies will be revealed when this relaunch happens. > > Warren Togami > > > > > Livna.org's website says > > that fedora.us has not yet finished rebuilding their packages even > > thou freshrpms, dag and have rebuilt theirs and we are almost 1/4 of > > the way though the next release cycle. > > > > I would prefer not to use freshrpm and others as there always seems to > > be conflicts with fedora base fedora.us and livna.org. > > > > so basically I'm asking what should I have in my fedora.us-extras.repo > > to get these "extras" > > > > many thanks > > mab > > > > >