> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:36 -0500, Noah Silva [Mailing list] wrote: > > Forgot some ... > > > > a. I have had performance problems and found some applications using an > > ENORMOUS amount of memory. Evolution was taking nearly 400mb at one > > ... > > I can't be the only one who's noticed this. > > I see this with the out of date version of Evolution I am running > (evolution-1.5.93-2) on an FC2 system: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 20276 kms 16 0 330m 135m 34m S 0.0 35.9 40:43.51 evolution > > I will be upgrading to FC3 soon, and I hope that will reducing things. > The memory usage appears to grow with time, and is directly related to > the number of messages per folder on my remote IMAP server (Dovecot on > another FC2 system). This is bad since I have some folders with many many thousands of messages (like the account used for this list). You'd think if I don't even go to a message it wouldn't be saving that much info about it. At any rate, I didn't seem to have this problem with 1.5. I mean... I have 1 GB of ram on this machine, it is kind-of irritating when it goes into a swapping frenzy because... email and web browsing is too much for it!? > > b. In evolution, in the calendar, the scrolling seems not to work right. > > It won't scroll until I go 4 or 5 blocks (in the month view) and then it > > will suddenly jump. Should this be files with Novell or Redhat? This > > seems to happen not on my rawhide machine. (Also sometimes entries don't > > update properly until restarting evo.) > Again, I see this with my 1.5.x evolution, but on my laptop (FC2 with > evolution-2.0.1-2) the calendar works much better, but I still get the > odd scrolling problem, like you describe, in the month view. I've never had the problem in 1.5. But - I only ever use the month view. I saw it on the 2.0 betas that were in the FC3 tests (1.6?), but I can't believe that made it to release. > Dave Malcolm should be able to let you know where to raise the bugs. > When you do create bugs, please let me know and I'll add my experiences. ok, I am going to have a look on Novell's site for now, since I know the new redhat policy is to get things fixed upstream as much as possible. > Keith. thanks, noah