On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 23:41 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:32:13PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > Is there some deeper significance in a version numbering for the > > current kernel from rawhide? The previous one was 2.6.9-1.667 and > > the one which showed up recently, with a build date "Mon 15 Nov 2004 > > 05:58:14 PM MST" is 2.6.9-1.650_devel. Of course yum will not pick > > it up as already a "newer" one is quite likely installed; even if > > its build date is "Tue 02 Nov 2004 01:24:30 PM MST". Even 'rpm' has > > to be gently persuaded before it will stoop to installing something > > so "older". > > > > My guess is that this will quite likely limit an exposure of this > > kernel to testers. > > I goofed. Next one goes out as _FC4 instead of _devel > > sorry, > > Dave > 2.6.9-1.650_FC4 will not be higher than 2.6.9-1.667 -sv