On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:16 -0700, Kim Lux wrote:
> Same thing. Progress was non existent and there were several Vs in the
> output. syslogs are clean of messages.
How many is "several" -- was it a constant line of them like the
previous run? Also, does the result sound even close to correct?
How long did track 5 take?
For that matter, what did the result of the old run sound like? Was it
completely trash, or was there real data in it?
--
Peter