I agree with the comfort of easily installing software packages, but having more managers to handle software package on a single machine may cause confusion on troubleshooting packages that may cause problems. On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:41:16 -0700, Kim Lux <lux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the new kdevelop is better than anjuta. With kdevelop you can > import existing projects. > > I agree with the package manager comments. > > > > > On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 22:13 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:40 +0800, joelbryan wrote: > > > This where just mere application request, an open discussion of > > > suggested software hoping to be release for FC4. > > > > Definitely Anjuta. I use it myself. > > > > And put in postgresql-devel and libpqxx--a full set of libraries and > > includes for creating client apps for PostgreSQL in C/C++. > > > > For that matter, why not include wxGTK and its KDE equivalent? That's > > GPL, AFAIK. > > > > And while you're at it: the OpenOffice SDK. > > > > And--oh, yes: the Apache XML-FO processor. (And make sure that the XSL > > processor installs as part of Linux--I think it does, though. It's never > > turned up missing--but I always install DocBook stuff, just in case.) > > > > And finally: apt and Synaptic. Yes, I know you include yum, and yum > > saved my bacon lately. But--you can't have too many package managers. A > > good desktop administrator should include them all: apt, yum, and > > up2date. > > > > What I've just named are the apps that I always go out and bag every > > time I install Fedora Core on a new machine. Well, not all of them--I > > haven't named the ones that distribute under their own licenses that are > > incompatible with the GPL. These include: > > > > acroread > > Java (at least the JRE if not the SDK) > > mplayer > > > > Temlakos > > > > > -- > Kim Lux (Mr.) Diesel Research Inc > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list >