ons, 10.11.2004 kl. 18.20 skrev Kim Lux: > I share most of your sentiments. > > gqview is missing as well. It was my favorite photo organizing tool. > > I agree that synaptic should be shipping with FC distros. > but synaptic is based on apt which will *NOT* be shipped. And i love apt/synaptic. Just forget it. Or port synaptic over to yum :) > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 08:58 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 07:35, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > > > ons, 10,.11.2004 kl. 10.09 +0000, skrev mike: > > > > Is there a reason why gtkam is missing from FC3 > > > > > > > > Is there a replacement? > > > > > > > Yes, gthumb replaces gtkam. It uses the same library to access the > > > cameras and in addition has a UI based on GTK+-2.x > > > > > > Cheers > > > Kjartan > > > > I see! Or, I think I see. Now why didn't the release notes specifically > > *say* that gthumb performs all the functions of the old gtkam? (Does > > gthumb have a plug-in for gimp?) > > > > Which goes to the serious, and so far not-addressed, issue of > > documentation. *Where are the documents* showing quite clearly all the > > functions of the packages that distribute with Fedora? How are we > > supposed to know that a retained package subsumes the functions of > > another if nobody tells us? Think of how many people, not readers of any > > of these lists, went out and grabbed gtkam after installing FC3 or one > > of its RC's and *didn't have to*! (That might not seem important at > > first, but think of the conflicts you set up if you run two apps at once > > that each address the same device...!) > > > > And when will *apt* distribute with Fedora? The best package manager > > ever invented, the best solution to the RPM dependency problem I've ever > > seen, works like a charm with Fedora, and it's not in the core distro? > > Something's wrong here. > > > -- > Kim Lux (Mr.) Diesel Research Inc