On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 04:53 +0100, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote: > On Die, 2004-10-26 at 00:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > That is an unfortunate error of judgement on their part. Let's not > > compound it by advocating the fundamentally flawed snake oil which is > > SPF in an inappropriate forum. > > Since you unfortunately decided to prolong the discussion about this > subject, what is your problem with SPF? > I agree with Thomas here. If you are going to pronounce such a thorough condemnation of something, and do so with an authoritative tone, you must provide some foundation for your views. Else it's just hot air. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part