Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 04 novembre 2004 �5:37 -0500, Peter Jones a �it :
> Also note that those which are signed are currently signed by hand, and
> one thing people have been advocating is automatic signing.  Automatic
> signing, I'll obviously argue, is a total loss.

What is a ssl server if it's not an automatic signing machine ?
Total loss...



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]