On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 15:35 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> And this assumption is wrong. A signature on a package is absolutely not
> correlated to the quality of it.
That last sentence should read: "Having a Red Hat signature on a package
is absolutely not correlated to the quality of it." -- i.e. we generally
sign all packages "leaving the house", be they Rawhide, beta or final.
Sorry for the confusion this may have caused.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011