Le jeudi 28 octobre 2004 à 19:32 -0300, Alexandre Oliva a écrit : > If you read it or not, and if you choose to believe I wrote it or not, > is up to you. Your mail is not a kernel or libc or the default background wallpaper. I don't use evolution as root. I never install unknown package (or run .exe) attached to a mail. > Such a key would have to be signed by another Red Hat key to be of any > value. Yes, it's better. Is it needed ? I don't think. btw : "The Fedora Project is not a supported product of Red Hat, Inc." > I've already exposed my > arguments, and I intend to step out of this debate now. I've already > spent far too long exposing good security practices Yes. > to someone who > doesn't seem to want to listen. Perhaps :-) it's the second time I am arguing for signed rpm. A large majority seem satisfied with the current rule. It's time to me to shut up. Thank for your replies.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=