On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 10:58 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 10:47 -0400, Amitabha Roy wrote: > > My experience mirrors Tim's so I second his opinion about the Network config > > utilities in Fedora being too cluttered and too confusing for users. > system-config-network is indeed overly confusing (even to me, and I'm no newbie in this case) and is not a good design although it *was* a good idea. I am *still* having troubles with it which make me think it is broken, although if it's not then it's definitely horribly designed. > That interface will be NetworkManager eventually. > Does that mean that system-config-network will go away? Yay!!! I mean, no offense meant to the guys/gals who worked hard to code it. But the UI and the choices made are *NOT* the best they could have been. The whole "copy" versus "new" difference between aliases and logical devices, plus the interaction of profiles and devices and what you can/can't do just does not work well. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part