Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> (*) no offense intended to the authors of yum, nor any implication
> about lack of security or reliability in yum; I just found the wording
> would be funny :-)

Heh[1]


[1] None Taken[2]

[2] Though if I were to take offense I would definitely do it in a
footnote.[3]

[3] Footnotes are cool.

-sv



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]