Not to be picky or anything, but the NetworkManger applet looks pretty damn ugly compared to Netapplet :-) On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:24:17 -0400, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 18:11 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 11:02 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > There is an argument for having a menu item "open config info" that > > > launches system-config-network if you have static IP configuration for a > > > card, but the fact of static IP is that you aren't supposed to change it > > > that often. So if you don't change it that often, why have an entry for > > > it in the menu? When we get dialup support, there might be an argument > > > for having a configure item for those, however. > > > > How do you handle the chance that I might regularly use wireless on two > > networks, with a (different) static IP on each? > > Do you control the networks in question? If so, it's actually quite > easy to configure the DHCP server to assign static IP addresses for > particular MAC addresses. That way you get all the benefits of DHCP > (not having to manually configure individual computers with e.g. > nameservers) with all the benefits of static addressing. > > > > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list >