On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 12:57, Elliot Lee wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Mark Haney wrote: > > > Okay where'd RC1 come from? I think I missed that memo. Is it just > > another name for T3? > > The release candidate trees are trees that are candidates to be released > as FC3. I make them available in the interests of keeping you all involved > during the final stages of this FC3 release cycle. > > RC[12] are not "official" milestone releases in the same sense as > test1/test2/test3/final - the RC labels are just labels, which I use so > that we have a common language to use when talking about various trees. > > Cheers, > -- Elliot Oooh! Okay. I'm cool with that. I just wasn't sure where that came from since I've been a loyal Fedora user since the pre-FC1 days and never heard that verbage used on the lists before. Thanks for clarifying. I think RC releases are fine as 'official' or 'unofficial', it just got me confused. Lord knows I don't need any help with that. :) -------------------------------------- Mark Haney Network Administrator InterAct Public Safety Systems mhaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) Kernel: 2.6.8-1.521 GNU/Linux 13:30:42 up 5:51, 1 user, load average: 4.10, 3.63, 3.22
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part