Elliot Lee wrote on Tuesday 26 October 2004 15:57: > http://testing.fedora.redhat.com/tree/ > > Mirror at http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/FC3-rc/3/ > > This tree seeks your loving attention in installation and testing. > Please speak now (via http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/) or > forever hold your peace about critical bugs. :) And thanks for taking > the time so far on FC3rc1. > > Cheers, > -- Elliot The x86_64 iso's at http://testing.fedora.redhat.com/tree/x86_64/iso/ are dated 10/21, which seems wrong. Things look OK in other directories after a quick scan. Files in http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/FC3-rc/3/x86_64/iso/ have date 10/26, but let me ask: Are they correct? :) David P.S. I sent the above to this list and fedora-devel, but I'm subscribed with different addresses so the message to this list got held for moderation. Off to fix that next... I just installed rc2 using http from boot.iso (thanks for the bandwidth, Duke! :). Two quick comments: My monitor gives good ddc information, and it's listed as a known monitor. But it isn't configured as that monitor automatically. Why? Can't this be done better? The "Additional CDs" screen of firstboot mentions "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Extras". David