Re: ntfs kernel module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ntfs kernel module
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <1098820185.27707.54.camel@va.local.linuxlobbyist.org>
List-archive: </archives/fedora-test-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Actually a bit of googling came up with the answer:

redhat doesn't know (as of march 27, 2003) if ntfs is patent encumbered or 
not.

-Dan

References:
- Re: ntfs kernel module
  - From: Paul Iadonisi

Prev by Date: Re: ntfs kernel module
Next by Date: Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?
Previous by thread: Re: ntfs kernel module
Next by thread: Re: ntfs kernel module
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]