Le dimanche 24 octobre 2004 à 09:43 +0100, Paul Nasrat a écrit : > On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 19:48 +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote: > > Le samedi 23 octobre 2004 à 12:49 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit : > > > I already state in fedora-config-list that s-c-sc is quite broken. In > > short, the maintainer say me "go away" (or some like) and request me to > > file known bugs. > > Please, no-one was telling you to go away No-one. Humm... The point is that it's anormal that these _old_ bugs are still in FC3 and not are marked as "ASSIGNED" or in FC3Blocker/FC3Target . > - asking you to file bugs Bugs are filed (since November 1st) and what I get ? One bug closed with "NOTABUG" : http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134358 > and break things down is a very different thing. > Communication goes both ways. Right. > This sounds very bitter and hostile, Yes. "Fedora project is perfect and all criticism are irrelevant" is not an answers for all problems. > and I thought we'd started > to bridge the misunderstandings here. > > > It's done since 2004-10-01 : > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134339 > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134321 > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134318 > > Yes and those were acknowledged on config list, I'm sure that when > development unfreezes again things will start to progress, but posts > that sound like trolls (even if unintentionally) aren't going to help. > > Paul >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=