On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 18:07 +0000, Andrew wrote: > udev-039-3 came out about 3 days ago. Andrew, It's much easier to find text if you don't top-post; I had just about deleted your message since I couldn't easily find what you added. That being said, forgive me if I don't understand your message. Are you saying udev might have caused the problem? That this version would have fixed that problem? Any other possible interpretations? If you're suggesting that 039-3 might have fixed it, then no... my system is currently up-to-date with 039-6 and I still have that behavior. If -3 might have broken it... well OK, but now what? How do I help track this problem so it gets fixed? Other than filing a bug which says "umm... it broke" I don't have a clue what else to do. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part