On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 07:46:12 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It is necessary, or otherwise rpm doesn't know that an upgrade
> requires the old package to be uninstalled first. It will do it out of
> order and fail like the original poster stated.
Originally, it would be avoided with explicit
Requires: tesseract-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
in package "tesseract".
Within the packaging guidelines, there's a section added in 2013 [!]
that only comments on an acceptable use scenario of "Conflicts".
If it were a MUST to avoid implicit conflicts during a system update,
then the guidelines ought to fix the wording and make it a MUST.
--
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
