Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Other then some missing RPMFusion packages

Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 09:13 skrev Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
>
> Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
> >
> > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> > # This is last time we should do that :)
> >
> > sudo dnf module reset '*'
> >
> > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> > --assumeno distro-sync
> >
> >
> > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.
> >
> > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
> >
> >
> > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.
> >
> >
> > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.
> >
> > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 40. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
> >
> > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
> >
> > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall) reports:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13416789
> >
> >
> > Two notes:
> >
> > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
> >
> > * this command found several issues on my workstation. One was issue with teamd that you will likely hit too:
> >
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334
> >
> > and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I reported. For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Miroslav
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux